|
Post by hansoo on Mar 15, 2015 16:05:41 GMT
Good intentions are not enough. I do believe results have certain amount of influence or extent when it comes to decide the overall shape of one. Though it always begins from knowing one's purpose or intention, the outcome is equally or even more importantly important. What good does it serve when the outcome hurts others even if one had good plans?
|
|
|
Post by saimoon1 on Mar 15, 2015 18:23:39 GMT
Yes, there is no way a person can predict what the outcome will be. If a person have good intentions, but for some reason, ended up harming a lot of other people in the process, that is justifiable. They should not be blamed in that instance.
|
|
|
Post by brandonina on Mar 15, 2015 19:28:17 GMT
I think the outcome doesn't matter unless the intention was good and just. But it's just that things don't go the way people wish to be. And others may misunderstand their actions without knowing their intention by just looking at the consequences.
|
|
|
Post by irin on Mar 15, 2015 22:59:50 GMT
I think like they has good idea and depends what they think we can see their personality like their goods or bad. Even though they have good outomme if they doesn't insider people will hate it.
|
|
misato
Junior Member
Posts: 97
|
Post by misato on Mar 16, 2015 7:36:53 GMT
I think that person is still good person even though the result he or she made was opposite. I think the person is already good at least trying to do good thing.
|
|
|
Post by nerdira on Mar 16, 2015 12:27:13 GMT
ya can't justify someone's intentions behind a certain action. I'm pretty sure hitler genuinely believed that he was helping his country. But it doesn't excuse the fact that millions of people died under his rule. Even though he did it for 'the good of Germany'
|
|
jason
Junior Member
Posts: 98
|
Post by jason on Mar 17, 2015 14:13:36 GMT
No because the outcome might be good but then the person's hands might be dirty.
|
|